AML Experts Ring in the New Year

AML Experts Ring in the New Year

In Focus

Monitoring Transactions


Not so long ago, financial institutions would disregard certain transactions and focus only on third parties; however, market practice has changed. I am looking for some official guidance on the subject.

Do you know where I can find official guidance to know if same beneficial owner transactions are not excluded from monitoring? On the other hand, have you ever read any comments or discussions around the importance of reviewing transactions between same "account holder" or "beneficial owners," in the transaction monitoring process?


I do think to some extent that it is important, as it may be a sign of layering. So, in order to detect smurfing or any other type of unusual patterns that could be suspicious, it's best to also look at transfers between your own accounts of high-risk to medium-risk clients. Any guidance could be looked for in cases of the annual reports of certain financial intelligence units.

Magali Lourens, CAMS

*The question and answers found in this document are excerpts taken from the Investigations, Reporting Forum. Visit ACAMS forums to read more posts.

Chapter Happenings

ACAMS' Chapter Development Program aims to focus the association's international efforts in anti-money laundering education and training at a regional level. Chapters provide local forums to facilitate discussion, offer education targeting area-specific issues and foster professional networking among ACAMS members.

For more information on ACAMS Chapters please visit the chapters section on or contact our Chapter Relations team at

New Year Meeting and Social
January 15, 2019
Dallas, TX, United States

Food Stamp Fraud
January 3, 2019
Cleveland, OH, United States

Networking Event
January 31, 2019
Uncasville, CT, United States

ACAMS Connecticut Chapter Fifth Annual All-Day Learning Event
February 1, 2019
Uncasville, CT, United States


ACAMS Guest Voices

One comment

Leave a Reply